Signs you need this
- A proof of concept works in demos but nobody can say what it will cost or how it fails at scale.
- Several teams are building AI features with no shared retrieval, prompt or evaluation infrastructure.
- You need to hire for an AI product but don't yet have a design to hire against.
Overview
Most AI projects fail between the notebook and production: the model works, but the data contracts, evaluation loop, cost controls and fallbacks were never designed. AI architecture is the discipline of designing those parts first.
Our founder is a practising AI architect. Engagements start with your business decision, map the data and latency realities around it, and produce a blueprint your team (or ours) can build against: components, interfaces, evaluation gates, cost envelopes and failure modes.
How this differs from System Design & Architecture: System Design & Architecture covers the software platform; AI Architecture adds the model, data, evaluation and cost layers that make AI features reliable.
What we deliver
- Target architectureComponent diagram, data flow, model-serving topology and integration points with your existing systems.
- Model strategyBuild, fine-tune, or call an API? A reasoned recommendation per use case with cost and latency projections.
- Evaluation designOffline and online metrics, golden datasets, regression gates and human-review loops.
- Guardrails & safetyInput/output filtering, PII handling, fallback paths and audit logging built into the design.
- Cost & capacity modelToken, GPU and storage forecasts across expected load so finance is not surprised later.
- Implementation roadmapPhased plan with milestones, risks and the team shape needed for each phase.
Where it fits
Greenfield AI productYou have a product idea that depends on LLMs or ML and need the system designed before hiring or building.
Pilot to productionA proof of concept worked in demos; it now needs reliability, cost control and observability.
Platform for many use casesSeveral teams want AI features; you need shared retrieval, prompt management and evaluation infrastructure.
Architecture reviewAn independent assessment of an AI system that is already built, with prioritised remediation.
Technology we use
Chosen per project. We are vendor-neutral and will recommend what fits your constraints.
Anthropic ClaudeOpenAIGoogle GeminiLangGraphLangChainWeaviatePineconeChromaDBKafkaRedisAWSGCPAzureKubernetesRagas
How we work
Discovery
Business objective, decision points, data inventory, latency and compliance constraints.
Options analysis
Two or three candidate architectures compared on cost, risk, time-to-value and team fit.
Blueprint
Detailed design, interface contracts, evaluation plan and roadmap, reviewed with your stakeholders.
Build oversight
Optional: our architect stays on to guide implementation and sign off milestones.
Typical first engagement
A two- to four-week architecture engagement producing a target design, model strategy, evaluation plan, cost model and roadmap.
AI readiness checklist
Twenty questions we ask before designing any AI system. If you can answer most of them, you are ready to build…
Open
Common questions
Do you only design, or also build?
Both. Many clients start with a design engagement and then have our engineering team implement it; others take the blueprint to their in-house team.
Which LLM vendor do you recommend?
It depends on the task, data-residency requirements and cost profile. We are vendor-neutral and have shipped on Claude, OpenAI and Gemini.
How long does an architecture engagement take?
Typically two to six weeks depending on system scope and how many stakeholders need to be involved.