Signs you need this
- Every feature touches every part of the codebase.
- One slow dependency takes the whole platform down.
- You are planning for 10x load and nobody can say where it will break.
Overview
Good system design is mostly about boundaries: which service owns which data, how components communicate, what happens when something is slow or down. Get those right and features become cheap; get them wrong and every change is a rewrite.
We produce system designs and architecture decision records for new platforms and for existing ones that have outgrown their original shape, covering service decomposition, event-driven patterns, data ownership and multi-region deployment.
How this differs from Cloud & DevSecOps: System Design decides service boundaries, data ownership and communication patterns; Cloud & DevSecOps builds the infrastructure and pipelines that run them.
What we deliver
- Architecture blueprintService boundaries, data ownership, communication patterns and deployment topology.
- Event-driven designKafka-based streaming, CDC and asynchronous workflows where they fit.
- Scalability planCapacity modelling, caching strategy and horizontal scaling paths.
- Resilience designFailure modes, retries, circuit breakers, backups and recovery objectives.
- Architecture decision recordsDocumented trade-offs so decisions survive team changes.
- Modernisation roadmapIncremental path from monolith to services without a big-bang rewrite.
Where it fits
New platformDesign the foundations for a product before the first line of code.
Scaling painsIdentify the bottlenecks and design the path to 10x load.
Monolith decompositionCarve out services safely, one domain at a time.
Multi-tenant SaaSIsolation, tenancy models and per-tenant scaling designed in from the start.
Technology we use
Chosen per project. We are vendor-neutral and will recommend what fits your constraints.
MicroservicesEvent-driven architectureKafkaRedisPostgreSQLCassandraScyllaDBDockerKubernetesAWSAzureGCPGraphQLREST
How we work
Context
Business drivers, current architecture, constraints and quality attributes.
Design
Candidate designs with trade-offs, converging on a documented target.
Validation
Prototype the risky parts and review with your engineers.
Roadmap
Sequenced steps with measurable checkpoints.
Typical first engagement
An architecture assessment producing a risk-ranked findings list, a target design and a sequenced roadmap.
Common questions
Do you write ADRs?
Yes. Every significant decision is recorded with context, options and consequences.
Microservices or monolith?
Whichever fits your team and load. We recommend a well-structured monolith more often than people expect.
Can you review our existing architecture?
Yes. A short assessment produces a prioritised list of risks and improvements.